<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Shelley &#187; History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesshelley.net/category/history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesshelley.net</link>
	<description>Ideas, Footnotes &#38; Revelations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 03:31:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Creative Polis</title>
		<link>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/09/creative-polis/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=creative-polis</link>
		<comments>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/09/creative-polis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Shelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solidarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesshelley.net/?p=1608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While listening to a lecture by physicist Geoffrey West I was struck again by how important cities are to our species.1 The polis, the urban jungle, represents more than a collaborative sharing of resources–cities are the built environments that have  invigorated growth, invention and the multiplication of humanity at an exponential pace, in ways we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While listening to a lecture by physicist Geoffrey West I was struck again by how important cities are to our species.<sup><a href="http://jamesshelley.net/2011/09/creative-polis/#footnote_0_1608" id="identifier_0_1608" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Geoffrey West, Why Cities Keep on Growing, Corporations Always Die, and Life Gets Faster, July 25, 2011">1</a></sup> The <em>polis</em>, the urban jungle, represents more than a collaborative sharing of resources–cities are the built environments that have  invigorated growth, invention and the multiplication of humanity at an exponential pace, in ways we could never even imagine as isolated clusters of individuals. At the heart of progress is the heart of the city. Whether you measure ingenuity by artistic inventions or registered patents, it’s virtually impossible not to demonstrate the centralization of progressive creativity emanating from the centre of urban hubs. The metropolis is, at its core, a microcosmic metaphor for the human whole experiment we call <em>modern society</em> today. Maybe the drive to collaborate is in our genes.</p>
<p>I have started working in a new office space, a shared working environment called <em>kowork</em> here in London.<sup><a href="http://jamesshelley.net/2011/09/creative-polis/#footnote_1_1608" id="identifier_1_1608" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="See kowork London">2</a></sup> The vision behind the space is to provide a collaborative working environment for creatives and entrepreneurs. My office companions are working on diverse projects, but there is one thing we all have in common: an understanding that by working in physical proximity to one another and sharing ideas we create, in essence, our own synergistic “creative polis.”</p>
<p>The point here is <em>not</em> that everyone must move to a big city to be creative. Simply, maybe we would all benefit by being part of a creative consortium (regardless of whether one lives in a rural, urban or suburban context). Intermingling ideas, cross-pollinating perspectives, incubating ridiculous, outlandish notions — you gotta have at least a couple toes dipping into a community like this. Are you part of a creative polis?</p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_1608" class="footnote">Geoffrey West, <a href="http://download.fora.tv/rss_media/podcasts/featured_audio/2011-07-25_west-longnow-13967_featured_audio.mp3"><em>Why Cities Keep on Growing, Corporations Always Die, and Life Gets Faster</em></a>, July 25, 2011</li><li id="footnote_1_1608" class="footnote">See <a href="http://www.kowork.ca/">kowork London</a></li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/09/creative-polis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://download.fora.tv/rss_media/podcasts/featured_audio/2011-07-25_west-longnow-13967_featured_audio.mp3" length="52322990" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summoning the Fertility Deities</title>
		<link>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/05/summoning-the-fertility-deities/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=summoning-the-fertility-deities</link>
		<comments>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/05/summoning-the-fertility-deities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Shelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesshelley.net/?p=812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a vegetable garden makes fertility goddess worship make sense. After planting, one does indeed contemplate how one might petition the gods of germination, photosynthesis and squirrel plagues to do one’s bidding. For me, the garden is just a hobby. But what if  my friends and family literally depended on this miracle? (“Miracle” here meaning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a vegetable garden makes fertility goddess worship make sense.</p>
<p>After planting, one does indeed contemplate how one might petition the  gods of germination, photosynthesis and squirrel plagues to do one’s  bidding.</p>
<p>For me, the garden is just a hobby. But what if  my friends and family literally <em>depended</em> on this miracle? (“Miracle” here meaning that the tomatoes actual grow.)</p>
<p>Imagine the severity of this equation: if the plants don’t grow, we starve. To make matters worse, it is now totally out of anyone’s control. After  planting, fertilizing and watering, there is nothing left to do but  wait…and hope.</p>
<p>Inari, Kokopelli and Pan make “sense” to me. No, you won’t find me  performing any sacrifices or ritual rain dances in the backyard, but I  think I know <em>why</em> agricultural society and fertility deity worship were inseparable for so many millennia. Gardening to survive <em>is</em> scary. If my life depended on this, you had  better believe I would be willing to worship/appease just about anything.</p>
<p>Also, gardening is <em>sexy</em>. It does not appear that the ancients had  categorical divisions between their “farming lives” and their “reproductive  lives.” Sustenance is required for tribal growth. All growth, literally. No food equals no  babies surviving. Fertility in one “department” is required for  fertility in the other. Only the very affluent can afford to think of them  separately.</p>
<p>Just something to think about (and appreciate) on your next trip to the grocery store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/05/summoning-the-fertility-deities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Day After</title>
		<link>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/05/the-day-after/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-day-after</link>
		<comments>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/05/the-day-after/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Shelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesshelley.net/2011/05/the-day-after/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The day after a national election feels like living in New York the day after either the Mets or the Yankees beat the other in the World Series: some people feel an euphoric hope that, at last, the country has been set right; others limp along with the oozing angst that all has been lost. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day after a national election feels like living in New York the day after either the Mets or the Yankees beat the other in the World Series: some people feel an euphoric hope that, at last, the country has been set right; others limp along with the oozing angst that all has been lost. And everyone seems to forget that the pendulum will keep swinging, that temporality is the only thing of permanence, and that the unforeseen ahead is only as mysterious as the events of last night–except that they have not yet transpired. Like the manic sports fan who goes into fits of depression or ecstasy depending on the final score, both the euphoric and the deflated voter should acknowledge that in politics, as in sports, nobody is ever a winner — or a loser — forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/05/the-day-after/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breath of the Spirit</title>
		<link>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/04/breath-of-the-spirit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=breath-of-the-spirit</link>
		<comments>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/04/breath-of-the-spirit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Shelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesshelley.net/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hebrew word for breath was ruwach: the wind, breeze; movement of air from the very nostrils of God. When the Jews translated their writings into Greek they had to transfer ruwach into another language. They chose the Greek word pneuma, also meaning a movement of air, breath or wind. But Greek was much more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hebrew word for breath was <em>ruwach</em>: the wind, breeze; movement of air from the very nostrils of God.</p>
<p>When the Jews translated their writings into Greek they had to transfer <em>ruwach</em> into another language. They chose the Greek word <em>pneuma</em>, also meaning a movement of air, breath or wind.</p>
<p>But Greek was much more than another language: it was another way of <em>thinking</em>. In Greek thought, the concept of God grew increasing removed from the physical elements of the earth. God became <em>eternal</em> (like one of Plato’s Forms) and existed in another time space dimension. After all, if God had created time and space, he must transcend it. God’s breath, <em>pneuma</em>, was no longer the wind. <em>Pneuma</em> became associated with <em>divine</em> interventions in reality, manifestation of <em>transcendent</em> invasions in temporal existence.</p>
<p>When the Church translated the Bible from Greek into Latin, <em>pneuma</em> became <em>spiritus</em> (Latin for <em>breath</em>), which we later inherited in English as <em>spiritual</em>. Even though the root concept of spirituality is rooted in the wind — God’s breath, the physical manifestations of God’s interactions with the elements of earth — the word has come to mean exactly the <em>opposite</em> of physical.</p>
<p>The point? Ancient spirituality was physical. God was <em>not</em> yet this immortal, invisible, inconceivable mystery: God could walk in a garden. God could be a pillar of fire, real fire. God could talk in a cloud. God had two hands. God had <em>breath</em> — and the wind on your face was literally the breath of this powerful being.</p>
<p>Etymologically speaking, <em>spirituality means breath</em>. It means life. Ask anyone who has had a “spiritual experience” and they will tell you about the moment that they felt most alive. Perhaps the more <em>alive</em> we are — the more conscious we are of our own <em>being here</em> — the more spiritual we become… whether we are “religious” or not.</p>
<p>Spirituality is a very, very physical thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/04/breath-of-the-spirit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashamed</title>
		<link>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/ashamed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ashamed</link>
		<comments>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/ashamed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Shelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesshelley.net/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I were a Muslim, I’d be ashamed of indiscriminate acts of violence carried out in the name of Allah, who said caring for orphans and widows were truly righteous acts.1 If I were a Christian, I’d be ashamed of a greedy, blood-stained history, justified in the name of Jesus, who explicitly taught love for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were a Muslim, I’d be ashamed of indiscriminate acts of violence<br />
carried out in the name of Allah,<br />
who said caring for orphans and widows were truly righteous acts.<sup><a href="http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/ashamed/#footnote_0_169" id="identifier_0_169" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Quran, Al-Baqarah 178">1</a></sup></p>
<p>If I were a Christian, I’d be ashamed of a greedy, blood-stained history,<br />
justified in the name of Jesus,<br />
who explicitly taught love for one’s enemies.<sup><a href="http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/ashamed/#footnote_1_169" id="identifier_1_169" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="New Testament, Matthew 5:44">2</a></sup></p>
<p id="passage_heading">If I were a Jew, I’d be ashamed of the oppressive slaughter of the Palestinians<br />
declared as a territorial right in the name of Yahweh,<br />
who called Israel to be a blessing to the world.<sup><a href="http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/ashamed/#footnote_2_169" id="identifier_2_169" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Bible, Genesis 12:1-3">3</a></sup></p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_169" class="footnote">Quran, Al-Baqarah 178</li><li id="footnote_1_169" class="footnote">New Testament, Matthew 5:44</li><li id="footnote_2_169" class="footnote">Bible, Genesis 12:1–3</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/ashamed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restraint in Words</title>
		<link>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/restraint-in-words/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=restraint-in-words</link>
		<comments>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/restraint-in-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Shelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brevity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesshelley.net/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the economic cost of publishing words diminishes, so too does the quality of the words. Yet we are realizing once again that the quality of words does not rest in their number but in their meaning. He that has knowledge spares his words.1 Confucius, Solomon and the sages uttered their prescriptions in worlds where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the economic cost of publishing words diminishes, so too does the quality of the words. Yet we are realizing once again that the quality of words does not rest in their number but in their meaning.</p>
<blockquote><p>He that has knowledge spares his words.<sup><a href="http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/restraint-in-words/#footnote_0_163" id="identifier_0_163" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Proverbs 17:27">1</a></sup></p></blockquote>
<p>Confucius, Solomon and the sages uttered their prescriptions in worlds where writing was extremely costly, a luxury of the rich and powerful. But perhaps their brevity was not merely a result of an economic ceiling; perhaps disciplined restraint with words remains the wisest form of language use to this day.</p>
<p>Fewer words can say more.</p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_163" class="footnote">Proverbs 17:27</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/restraint-in-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opium of the Internet</title>
		<link>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/opium-of-the-internet/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=opium-of-the-internet</link>
		<comments>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/opium-of-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Shelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesshelley.net/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Hosni Mubarak’s government shut down communication channels many people wondered how it would affect the Egyptian protests. Funny question. It turns out that the vast majority of history’s successful protests occurred before the dawn of the Internet. Protesters and revolutionaries have brought down governments for many centuries… long before Twitter was there to help [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Hosni Mubarak’s government shut down communication channels many people wondered how it would affect the Egyptian protests.</p>
<p>Funny question.</p>
<p>It turns out that the vast majority of history’s successful protests occurred before the dawn of the Internet. Protesters and revolutionaries have brought down governments for many centuries… long before Twitter was there to help them out.</p>
<p>Perhaps a more pertinent question is this: in what ways does the Internet <em>subdue</em> and <em>quell</em> revolutions? Turning off the Internet certainly does not stop civil uprisings — if anything it is an act of provocation — but leaving it on could sure go a long way to placating the masses, lulling them into the illusion they are “making a difference” while they gleefully retweet and “Like” all kinds of progressive sounding ideologies. And consequently do absolutely <em>nothing</em>.</p>
<p>If you want to stop a revolution, just leave the Internet switch “On” and let people inoculate themselves against actually <em>doing</em> anything drastic. Hell, all that trumpeting of self-expression is an exhausting form of entertainment anyway. (At least this is what I’m doing right now… nothing but typing.)</p>
<p>Listen up, all you masses — we have a new opiate for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesshelley.net/2011/02/opium-of-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

